3. Contextual overview — desk review activists such as Farah Yousef, Ziena Shahla, and Hiba Ezeldin. The analysis further revealed discursive patterns that confine women’s roles to domestic spaces, question their ability to drive or lead, and subject individuals with differing political views to sexualized and verbal harassment, reflecting deep societal polarization. While male activists are also attacked, women face heightened moral shaming and reputational damage. This pattern is often justified under sectarian or political labels and is frequently used as a form of moral erasure against anyone who voices different political opinions. Moreover, some comments extend to the civil society sector, accusing organizations that empower women or build their capacities of insincerity or financial opportunism. rampant crime due to your inciting speeches against the opposite gender on a global level, and you will bear the responsibility soon.” and/or “I feel sorry for you and see you as a suitable case study for psychiatric clinics. You are a mixture of moral depravity, lying, deceit, and homosexuality, with a little faith and some psychological issues. I am sure you are a hopeless case. Psychiatry has reached an advanced level in medical and behavioral treatments, but there is no cure for the disease of lying.” The result is not only immediate harm to individuals but an effect on public discussions: many potential contributors, especially women, choose silence over engagement, narrowing the space for diverse perspectives and accountability (ACAPS, 2025; Al-sakkaf and Alsayed, 2023; Mobaderoon co, 2025; UNFPA, 2024). Some comments extend to the civil society sector, accusing organizations that empower women or build their capacities of insincerity or financial opportunism. 3.5.2 Using ethnic and sectarian oriented GBVO comments to intensify hostility Analysis of the GBVO comments collected during the scan revealed four recurring patterns in which such comments appeared. These themes appeared to be non‑exclusive, as multiple forms often appeared within the same comment — for instance, a single post could be both sectarian‑­ oriented and appearance‑based. The four themes include: using GBVO to silence differing opinions; deploying ethnic or sectarian insults to escalate hostility; spreading appearance‑based harassment regardless of dress or social status; and using GBVO to marginalize women’s presence in the public sphere. 3.5.1 GBVO as a tool to silence differences in opinion In the dataset of scans, it was observed that GBVO comments are mostly offensive and hate‑filled, as comments ranged from direct insults and slurs to reputational threats and sexualized shaming. While men and women both face abuse, women are especially vulnerable because social norms expect them to remain quiet, and gendered attacks are used to push them further to the margins. For example, “She is the ridiculous TV presenter who, a few months ago, mocked the absence of slave women in the coastal area and ridiculed our pain. A TV presenter with many faces and colors.” “It is amusing that some call for equality while there is no platform or organization for men to express their opinions or defend their rights. The violence that women exercise against men has become a Many GBVO incidents combine gendered abuse with ethnic and religious sectarian hostility, for example those who publicly condemned the Sweida clashes (Al Jazeera, 2025) were accused of being Assad allies, further stigmatizing and silencing dissenting voices. For example, the case of Ziena Shahla, which surfaced during the GBVO social media scans and KIIs, illustrates how dissent becomes a trigger for gendered harassment. When Ziena Shahla, a journalist and activist, joined a peaceful “Syrian blood is sacred” vigil to denounce the Suwayda bloodshed, she was singled out with coordinated verbal attacks and reputational smears. Examples of attacks include: “A whore and sectarian woman who works for the #Zionists claimed to oppose Bashar al-Assad, and today she shows her support for the Israeli gangs” and “This is extremely painful; damn you all. What is this silence? Why don’t you stand with the Sunnis in Sweida? Children have their heads cut off while still alive, and women are raped and burned amidst their suffering. What kind of society allows such atrocities to happen? You are from the minority and a collaborator with the Zionists”. Additionally, the violence against Ziena Shahla extended from the online sphere towards the physical world where she was physically attacked and injured. 25 Many Gender-Based Violence Online incidents combine gendered abuse with ethnic and religious sectarian hostility.

Select target paragraph3