4. Data Analysis
Qualitative Data: A thematic analysis was con‐
ducted to uncover patterns and key themes derived
from the results and thorough conclusions of the Fo‐
cus Group Discussions (FGDs) and Key Informant
Interviews (KIIs). The analysis also examined the
psychological, social, impacts, as well as the effects
on political participation and engagement in civic
spaces.
5. Expected Outcomes
• Capacity Building: Findings will be used to build
the capacity of local organizations and government entities in addressing TFGBV. Moreover,
findings will be used to help identify which topics
need to be included in establishing curricula for
service providers to build communities’ capaci‐
ties.
• Awareness Raising: The research will contribute
to raising awareness about the impact of TFGBV,
promoting advocacy efforts for greater protection
of women and girls and other affected population
groups in digital spaces.
• Policy Recommendations: Insights from the
study will inform policy recommendations for
improving responses to TFGBV, particularly in
enhancing digital safety and supporting women’s
political participation and civic engagement more
broadly.
6. Research Limitations
Cultural Sensitivity
Navigating cultural taboos around discussing
gender-based violence, particularly within the digital
sphere, was a significant consideration in the
Jordanian context due to deep-rooted societal norms
surrounding family honor and gender roles. We
anticipated that fear of social stigma, potential
dishonor to families, or even retaliation might make
participants reluctant to openly discuss their
experiences during Key Informant Interviews (KIIs)
and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs).
While we did encounter instances where participants
initially hesitated to share their experiences, these
challenges were mitigated through several proactive
measures. First, we ensured that all participants
were informed about the confidentiality and
anonymity of their responses. Second, we provided
participants with the option to seek support from
protection service providers, either during or after
the discussions, which helped alleviate concerns
about potential repercussions
As a result, while the challenge of cultural sensitivity
was present, it did not significantly hinder the
openness of participants. By implementing these
measures, we were able to create a supportive space
that encouraged honest dialogue while respecting
cultural norms and safeguarding participants' wellbeing.
Prolonged Protocols
The research team initiated communication with
local actors at an early stage to incorporate their
input and insights into the research. However, due
to extended approval protocols, we were unable to
include their perspectives, resulting in no
representation from these stakeholders in any of the
conducted FGDs. A similar challenge was
encountered with representatives from UN agencies,
as there was a lack of response and follow-through
from their side. To address this, the researchers
followed up persistently by employing alternative
communication methods, including emails, phone
calls, and leveraging existing partnerships. These
13